Criminal and court cases against Alexander Orlovsky – crypto fraudster (part 2)

04.07.2025 4 minutes Author: Newsman

If the first part revealed the schemes of DMCA abuse, now it’s worth talking about real facts from official registers. Oleksandr Orlovsky is not just an infogypsy who actively works with reputation in Google. He is a person with real court decisions, fines, debts and lawsuits, which form a completely different portrait than the one broadcast in his Telegram channels and “courses”.

We strongly recommend reading the first part first — it uncovers how Oleksandr Orlovskyi has been actively abusing DMCA takedown requests to remove criticism and negative mentions from Google. This post is a direct continuation, now focused on official court records, legal penalties, debts, and lawsuits that paint a very different picture than his polished Telegram persona.

Court verdict for forging a COVID certificate

The public register of court decisions records:

Boryspil City District Court of Kyiv region, verdict dated 11/22/2021 in case No. 359/10494/21.

Oleksandr Oleksandrovych Orlovsky, General Director of *Starlife*, pleaded guilty to committing a criminal offense under Part 4 of Article 358 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – forgery of documents.

Fact: At Boryspil International Airport, Orlovsky presented a fake certificate of a negative COVID-19 test to avoid self-isolation after returning from abroad.

Court decision: a fine of 850 hryvnias.

FFA Crypto on the list of dangerous projects of the NSSMC

The National Securities and Stock Market Commission has published a list of dubious projects that violate the interests of investors. Among them are FFA Crypto RISE and FFA Crypto CAPITALIST, associated with Orlovsky.

These projects are listed as potentially fraudulent and dangerous. The information is posted on the official website of the NSSMC in the “Investor Protection” section.

SOURCE LINK

Driving while intoxicated – fine and deprivation of rights

01.12.2016, decision of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of the city of Kyiv in case No. 761/45439/16-p:

Orlovsky was driving a Volkswagen car on Shevchenko Blvd. with obvious signs of alcohol intoxication (Article 130 of the Code of Administrative Offenses).

The court established:

  • he did not appear for the hearing of the case;

  • the protocol was not appealed;

  • did not deny the guilt.

Punishment:

  • a fine of UAH 10,200;
  • deprivation of driving license for 1 year.

PrivatBank lost the court case over a loan of UAH 109,000

12/14/2022, decision of the Pechersky District Court of Kyiv in case No. 757/52921/22-ts.

Plaintiff — JSC CBPrivatBank“, defendant — Orlovsky Oleksandr Oleksandrovych.

The court established:

  • in 2016, Orlovskyi had a credit card;

  • later, the limit was increased to UAH 100,000;

  • the debt was not systematically repaid.

Total debt amount: UAH 109,000

The court satisfied the claim in full — the debt was collected. Open sources also record that after the start of enforcement proceedings, Orlovskyi went abroad to Poland.

Lawsuits of students against individual entrepreneur Orlovskyi

02/27/2024, decision of the Pecherskyi District Court of Kyiv in case No. 757/5484/24-ts.

Plaintiff — individual, defendant — individual entrepreneur Orlovskyi Oleksandr Oleksandrovych.

Subject of the dispute:

  • recognition of the contract as invalid;
  • recovery of funds paid for “training”.

The court found that the materials provided by the defendant did not meet the terms of the contract, and satisfied the plaintiff’s demands. This is not an isolated case – there are other cases with a similar essence in the court registry.

Public image vs. documentary reality

While Orlovsky presents himself as a crypto expert who “helps to earn money“, public documents paint a different portrait:

  • a person who pleaded guilty to forging medical documents;

  • deprived of his driver’s license for drunk driving;

  • a debtor who lost a bank lawsuit;

  • a person in the register of fraudulent projects;

  • a defendant in the legal cases of his own clients.

And most importantly – someone who is trying to remove all these facts from the information field with the help of DMCA complaints.

The Whole Truth Speaks Louder Than Promotion

After reviewing officially confirmed records from public registries, a complete picture of Oleksandr Orlovskyi emerges — not as a “crypto expert from Telegram”, but as a person systematically involved in fraud, document forgery, financial misconduct, and disinformation. His attempts to whitewash his name through mass DMCA takedown requests are nothing more than surface-level PR, incapable of covering up court rulings, bank debts, driver’s license suspension, and claims from his own clients.

This case clearly illustrates how a polished online persona can radically differ from the real-life background documented in legal decisions. What’s more telling is that instead of addressing these facts, Orlovskyi has chosen the path of digital erasure — scrubbing his name from search results instead of taking accountability.

In an era where trust in educational content is often sold through promises of “easy money”, only legal documents and court verdicts bring the conversation back to reality. And if he cannot honestly respond to these facts — then perhaps the silence is the loudest admission of all.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Коментарі
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Found an error?
If you find an error, take a screenshot and send it to the bot.