We are talking about Murat Urtembayev, the first Soviet hacker, who in 1983 carried out one of the first cyber attacks in the USSR
471 
Adrian Lamo is an American hacker and journalist who gained notoriety for exposing Chelsea Manning, the soldier who leaked classified information to WikiLeaks. Known as the “homeless hacker,” Lamo made a name for himself by breaking into the computer networks of major companies, including The New York Times and Microsoft. This article explores Lamo’s life journey, technical achievements, professional activities, and legacy in the world of cybersecurity and journalism.
Adrian Lamo is a famous American hacker whose work has included researching computer networks and identifying their vulnerabilities. His journey in cyberspace has often been controversial. Lamo, who gained fame as the “homeless hacker”, left a significant mark on cybersecurity history thanks to the exposure of Chelsea Manning, who passed secret military documents to WikiLeaks. This article highlights his professional path, unique lifestyle and the famous incidents that shaped his reputation.
Adrian Lamo was born on February 20, 1981 in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. His childhood was unstable, as the family moved frequently due to his father’s professional activities. For several years, Adrian lived in Arlington, Virginia, and later the family moved to Colombia, where the boy lived in the country’s capital, Bogotá. This period of his life had a significant impact on the formation of his worldview, in particular the perception of instability as the norm.
Seven years later, Lamo and his family returned to the United States, settling in San Francisco. There, he graduated from high school a year earlier than his peers, which testifies to his exceptional intellectual abilities.
However, even at a young age, Adrian was distinguished by an unconventional approach to life. His independent nature, love of travel, and inclination to study technology led to the fact that he began to lead a nomadic lifestyle. Using internet cafes, libraries, and public spaces, Lamo immersed himself in the world of computer networks, which were then relatively new and often vulnerable.
His early interest in technology and unconventional lifestyle were reflected in the nickname “homeless hacker.” Adrian lived out of a backpack, constantly traveling between cities and investigating vulnerabilities in computer systems. This was the beginning of his long journey into the world of cybersecurity, which made him one of the most famous and controversial hackers of his time.
Adrian Lamo rose to fame for his technical prowess and unique approach to hacking. His targets were typically high-profile organizations, and his activities drew both admiration in the tech world and outrage in legal circles.
In 2002, Lamo hacked the computer network of the famous media giant *The New York Times*. He not only hacked into their database, but also added his name to the list of expert sources used by journalists. This was done to highlight the vulnerability of the company’s security system. Lamo exploited weaknesses in the network and software to access confidential information. He also used the *LexisNexis* database to access the personal data of customers and employees.
This incident attracted widespread attention to his activities, but also led to a complaint from the company, which led to his arrest in 2003.
Lamo also hacked into Microsoft’s network, using an Internet cafe to hide his IP address. He gained access to the company’s internal servers, where he discovered vulnerabilities in the software that could be exploited by attackers. In particular, he gained access to information about unreleased products of the company, which could cause significant damage to the reputation of Microsoft if this data became public. After that, he provided the company with a report of his findings, trying to position himself as an “ethical hacker”, although he did so without official permission.
Lamo also hacked the systems of other large companies, such as Yahoo!, Bank of America and Cingular. His actions were always aimed at identifying vulnerabilities, but, as a rule, he did not receive material benefits from his hacks.
Lamo worked from any available device in public places: libraries, Internet cafes or even cyber clubs. He often reported the vulnerabilities found to the companies, but did so after the hack, which caused legal consequences.
Lamo’s actions forced many giants to reconsider their approach to network security. However, his methods remain controversial, as acting without the companies’ permission meant breaking the law, even if his goal was noble.
One of the most controversial episodes in Adrian Lamo’s life was his exposure of Chelsea Manning in 2010. This decision not only caused outrage in the hacking community, but also affected his own reputation, leaving a complex legacy.
Chelsea Manning (then Bradley Manning) was a military intelligence analyst in the U.S. Army at the time. During a private online chat, Manning shared with Lamo information about the transfer of classified military documents to WikiLeaks. These files included:
Video of the Iraq incident: footage showing an attack by a US military helicopter on civilians, including a Reuters journalist.
US diplomatic cables: thousands of documents revealing information about US diplomatic activities.
Military reports from Iraq and Afghanistan: details about operations and conflicts in these regions.
Manning spoke openly about her motives, including her desire to uncover the truth about the actions of the American military and government.
Despite the possible consequences, Lamo decided to pass on this information to the US government. He justified his choice by saying that the data he had discovered threatened national security. Lamo believed that the leak could endanger the lives of American military personnel and diplomats. He passed on the transcripts of Manning’s chats to the FBI and military intelligence.
This decision drew sharp criticism from many hackers and activists, who viewed his actions as treason. In hacker culture, confidentiality is often highly valued, and cooperation with the authorities is perceived as unacceptable. Lamo received numerous threats and became isolated in the community he had previously considered his home. He was accused of putting his own safety above the ideas he had previously supported.
Chelsea Manning was arrested and sentenced to 35 years in prison for violating the Espionage Act. Her sentence was later reduced, and she was released in 2017 after being pardoned by President Barack Obama. Manning became a symbol of the fight for free speech and exposing the truth. At the same time, many considered her actions dangerous because of the risks to national security.
This episode significantly changed Adrian Lamo’s life:
He has become one of the most controversial figures in the world of cybersecurity.
His actions are often analyzed as an example of a difficult moral choice, where the security of the country is opposed to the ethics of privacy.
Despite all the criticism, Lamo often stated that his decision was based on the belief that national interests should come first. His choice remains a hotly debated topic in the cybersecurity field today.
Adrian Lamo has always led a life that is different from the ordinary. He spent most of his time living in modest conditions, traveling with a backpack and staying with friends or in abandoned buildings. In 2010, his backpack was stolen, after which Lamo was detained and underwent a brief psychiatric evaluation. He was later diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, which helped to understand many of his personality and behavior.
Thanks to his work in the field of computer security, Lamo left a mixed legacy. He discovered numerous vulnerabilities in Fortune 500 networks, using his expertise as a tool to influence large companies. However, he also faced criticism, including accusations of self-promotion. Lamo often ignored negative comments, noting that his actions spoke for themselves.
On March 16, 2018, Adrian Lamo was found dead in Wichita, Kansas. His death left more questions than answers and sparked renewed interest in his life story. He remained one of the most controversial figures in the world of cybersecurity for the rest of his life.
Adrian Lamo’s legacy is complex and controversial. His contributions to the field of computer security will remain a significant example of both the consequences of hacking and the importance of moral choices in the world of cyberspace.
471 
707 